Article #112(continued from article #111)

Mendy ezagui

Monday feb 18th 2019 1.00am 34 year old mendy ezagui the son of yankel & leah 706 eastern
parkway apt 6a the incident that i had with him a week ago when he ordered me to go back towards
union st & 770 after passing him on front of bardys if he would not have done anything after passing me
on front of bardys he could have said something like this

I DID NOT DO ANYTHING TO MENACHEM.ALL I DID IS PASS HIM ON FRONT OF BARDYS.THE
FACT THAT HE IS TERRIFIED OF ME THAT IS HIS PROBLEM NOT MINE.JUST BECAUSE HE IS
TERRIFIED OF ME DOES NOT MEAN THAT I CAN NOT PASS HIM ON KINGSTON AVE JUST
BECAUSE HE IS TERRIFIED OF ME.I DID NOT DO ANYTHING TO HIM.

He could have said something like that if he would not have done anything after passing me.the way he
made me go back towards union st & 770 after frightening me by passing me on front of bardys that is
what the problem is.the fact that he frightened me by passing me on front of bardys that is a minor issue.
the way he ordered me to go back towards union st & 770 that is what the abuse is.

The reason he does it is because he knows that i am disabled & can not fight back.that is the reason why
he does it.just like the incident last year on purim when he frightened me by coming head on at me last
year on purim.he did that for the same reason.because he knows that i am disabled & can not fight back.

If you go over to article # 67 i spoke about it in article #67(april 2014).at that time he came over to me &
 physically forced me into a picture against my will then when i complained about it on this site he comes
over to me & starts videotaping me in 770 & on kingston ave because i complained about it on this site.

The reason he does it is because he knows that i am disabled & can not fight back.I will bet you all the
money in the world that the next time that me & mendy see each other someplace that he is going to do
something to me.i know it for a fact.the next time that me & this 34 year old idiot mendy ezagui see
each other someplace that he is going to do something to me.& the reason he is going to bully me again
is because he knows that i am disabled & can not fight back.& the reason why there are no pictures of
him online is because he probably runs out everytime that he sees a camera.

now this 34 year old idiot mendy ezagui i am going to imitate him right now.here i go.

MENACHEM HAS TO STAY AWAY FROM ME BUT I DON,T HAVE TO STAY AWAY FROM HIM & IF
MENACHEM DOES NOT STAY AWAY FROM ME THE WAY I WANT HIM TO THEN I HAVE THE
FULL LEGAL RIGHT TO DO WHATEVER I FEEL LIKE DOING TO HIM IF HE DOES NOT STAY
AWAY FROM ME THE WAY I WANT HIM TO MENACHEM

1)IS DISABLED  & CAN NOT FIGHT BACK

2)NOBODY CAN DO ANYTHING TO PROTECT HIM FROM PEOPLE LIKE ME

3)THERE ARE PROBABLY CAMERAS THAT RECORDED WHAT I DID BUT THE OWNER OF THE
CAMERA IS NOT GOING TO GIVE THE VIDEO TO HIM SO HE HAS NO EVIDENCE OF WHAT I
DID

& THAT IS THE REASON WHY I AM FREE TO BULLY MENACHEM AS MUCH AS I FEEL LIKE IT
WITHOUT ANY FEAR OF GETTING INTO TROUBLE FOR IT

Now as time goes on i am going to be talking about this more & more & more as time goes on

Menachem piekarski

Article #111(continued from article #110)

Description of mendy ezagui

Sunday feb 17th 2019 2.45am 34 year old mendy ezagui the son of yankel & leah 706 eastern parkway
apt 6a i googled his name to see if i can get a hold of any photos of him i could not find any photos of him
online.so since i don,t have any photos of him the only other option is to give a description of him.i
checked online but i could not get a hold of any photos of him so my only other option is to give a
description of this 34 year old idiot mendy ezagui.

He is completely clean shaven no beard no mustache no nothing a complete baldy.no hat no jacket.
the first time i saw him this way was over 6 years ago at the begining of the summer 2012.he is
completely clean shaven no beard no mustache no hat no jacket just like a street bum.he usually does
not wear anything over his shirt.when i saw him a week ago friday night he was wearing a coat
because of the cold weather & this is the first time i saw him with something over his shirt since he
became a street bum over 6 years ago.he usually does not wear anything over his shirt.he is a little bit
taller than me.only like an inch or 2 taller than me.he is nowhere near as fat as me.compared to me he
is considered skinny compared to me but i have seen people skinnier than him.

he used to work at kahans but he is not there anymore.he left kahans about 3 years ago.i don,t know
if he is still there now maybe yes maybe no but either he is still there or he used to work at manischewitz.

He is terrified of cameras.if you point a camera at him he is going to go crazy & do something to your
camera & probably to you also.to him a camera is the most dangerous weapon in the world.if you say
anything to him like the word camera, photo video or anything like that to him he is going to go crazy
just from you saying any of those words to him.

i googled his name but could not find any photos of him online so my only other option is to give a
description of him so everybody can have an idea of what this 34 year old idiot mendy ezagui looks
like.

Now as time goes on i am going to be talking about this more & more & more as time goes on.

Menachem piekarski (continues with article #112)

Article #110

Mendy ezagui

Motzoei shabbos feb 9th 2019 9.00pm i am very depressed right now.as soon as i feel better i am going
to be talking about this more & more & more as soon as i feel better.34 year old mendy ezagui the son
of yankel & leah 706 eastern parkway apt 6a i had a little incident with him friday night at around 8.15pm
friday night.

I was on kingston ave  in between union st & president coming from union st heading towards president.
this was on the side closer to albany ave.i was coming from union st heading towards president.he
passed me on front of bardys.as soon as he passed me on front of bardys i got very frightened &
crossed the street to avoid him.after crossing the street to avoid him i was on front of ebers liquor
shop.i figured let him go ahead of me.i said to myself i will let him go ahead & i will continue after he has
gone quiet a distance ahead of me.he continues on kingston ave towards president.when he gets to
president on front of raskins fruit store he turns around & starts running towards me.i was on front of
ebers liquor shop.he was on the other side of kingston by raskins fruit store.he turns around & starts
running towards me.seeing him running towards me i started heading back towards union st & 770.
when he saw me heading towards union st & 770 he stopped running & continued going wherever he
was heading to.

Now i can understand that.he wants me staying away from him.i can understand that.he wants me
staying away from him.but here is the thing.if he wants me staying away from him then why did he
pass me on front of bardys?i got there first.if he wants me staying away from him then he could have
stayed back let me go ahead then headed to wherever he was going after i am quiet a distance
ahead of him.that,s what he should have done.i got there first.

Alot of stores have cameras but there is no law that forces the owner of the camera to give the video to
the victim.there is no such law.if you go over to article #94 thru article #97 i spoke about it there in
those articles.the beating at simchas beis hashoeiva more than a year ago(sept oct 2017)i went to both
kettle & cord & to the community council & tried to get the video of the beating but they refused to give
the video to me.if i go to any of the stores on that block & ask them for the video they are not going to
give it to me.friday night feb 8th 2019 at 8.15pm if anybody can go to the stores on that block &
somehow get the owners of the cameras on that block to give the video to me because if i go to the
stores myself the owners of the cameras are not going to give the video to me.if anybody can force the
owners of all the cameras on that block to give the video to me.it was this past friday night feb 8th 2019
at 8.15pm

Now as time goes on i am going to be talking about this more & more & more as time goes on.

Menachem piekarski (continues with article #111)

Article #108

Section 8

Friday june 29th 2018 4.00am The good news is that i was aproved for section 8 housing.the 1st thing
is that i have to find a section 8 apartment.then after i find a section 8 apartment there is something else
also that i will need help with after i find a section 8 apartment.moving involves alot of expenses.& with
the limited budget that i am in there is no way that i will be able to pay for all the expenses involved in
moving(like hiring a moving company, leaving a security deposit & so forth)i will need somebody to
help me cover all the expenses involved in moving.but then there is something else that i am
concerned about even more than anything else.finding a section 8 apartment & finding somebody
who will help me cover all the expenses involved in moving those are all minor problems.there is
something else that i am concerned about even more than anything else.finding a section 8 apartment
& finding somebody who will help me cover all the expenses involved in moving those are all minor
things there is something else that i am concerned about even more than anything else.what i am
really concerned about is not to be neighbors with a jcw gangster.let,s say i find a section 8 apartment
& somebody can help me cover all the expenses involved in moving(like i will have to leave a security
deposit for my new apartment, all the expenses involved in moving & so forth)but my new apartment
involves me being neighbors with a jcw gangster & if i become neighbors with a jcw gangster there is
a 100% chance that the jcw gangster is going to give me problems there.if i find a section 8 apartment
& somebody helps me cover all the expenses involved in moving but my new apartment involves me
being neighbors with a jcw gangster then i am not going to take the apartment.

forget it i am not going to even look for an apartment.i don,t want to take the chances of being
neighbors with a jcw gangster.i am going to stay where i live right over here at 283 kingston because i
don,t want to take such a chance of being neighbors with a jcw gangster.i need a bigger apartment
but i am not going to take a chance of being neighbors with a jcw gangster.this shows you just how
much the abuse i have to go through now because of jcw.i can not even look for an apartment now
because of those jcw gangsters.the other hardships like finding a section 8 apartment & somebody
to help me with the moving expenses that is nothing compared to being neighbors with a jcw gangster.
If there is somebody that can help me out with this let me know.finding a section 8 apartment & the
expenses involved in moving that is a minor problem.my real concern is not to be neighbors with a
jcw gangster.i need a bigger apartment but i am not going to take such a chance like that.ok i am
going to stay right here in my tiny apartment at 283 kingston.living here in my tiny apartment at 283
kingston is not good for me either & i do need a bigger apartment but i would rather live in this tiny
apartment at 283 kingston than take chances of being neighbors with a jcw gangster.i don,t want to
be neighbors with a jcw gangster even if it,s the biggest apartment in the world.if there is anybody
that can help me out with this let me know.finding a section 8 apartment & the expenses involved in
moving that is also something that i need help with but my biggest concern is not to be neighbors with
a jcw gangster.if there is somebody that can help me out with this let me know.

Menachem piekarski.

Article #107(continued from article #106)

Inconsistencies

Tuesday june 5th 2018  3.00am This is a continuation of what i spoke about in article #106.  the people
that are against me because of what i once did to kids there are 4  different types.those that are
against me because of what i once did to kids there  are 4 different types.here they are.

1)they will do whatever they are able to do to me as long as they know that they will not get caught
doing it.to them i am the worst person that ever existed & a guy like me does not deserve to  live.

2)this is the vigilante type.they feel that the law is not doing  enough to protect the kids so they do
vigilante on me by making a set of rules that i have to obey & if i don,t go by their rules then they will do
something to me if i don,t go by their rules.

3)they are against  me they will try to do as much harm as possible but they are careful not to break
the law.if they see an opportunity to hurt me without breaking  the law then they will do it.

4)they are against me but they won,t do anything to me unless i bother them.

Now the  1st type which is they hold that i am the worst  person that ever existed & a guy like me
does not deserve to live.so that,s how you look at me.ok if you want to look at me that way fine look
at me that way but maybe you don,t mind if i ask you a couple of questions if it doesn,t bother you to
answer these questions for me.maybe you don,t mind if i ask you a  couple of questions if it doesn,t
bother you to answer these questions for me.& here it is.a guy like me who

1)is disabled

2)suffers alot from being depressed

3)went through a very traumatizing childhood

4)even though i weigh 300 lbs i can not fight back with somebody half my size

5)didn,t realize how serious it  is

6)didn,t mean any harm

7)has apologized 50 million  times for his actions

Maybe you don,t mind if you can explain to me how a guy like me is the worst person that ever existed.
if you can explain something like that to me then i would like to see you do it.

Now lets look at the 2nd type.which  is the vigilante type meaning that they feel that the law is not doing  
enough to protect the kids so they make a set of rules for me to obey & if i don,t go by their rules then
they will  do something to me if i don,t go by their rules & they are doing it because they feel that the
law is not doing enough to protect the kids.ok but maybe you don,t mind if i ask you a couple of
questions if it doesn,t bother you to answer these questions for me.

1)there are 168 people on the wall of shame.the rules that you give me to obey & if i don,t obey your
rules then you will do something to me if i don,t obey them.are you giving these same rules to all 168
people on the wall of shame?they all did the same thing that i did.are you giving these rules to all 168
people on the wall of shame?if you are giving the same rules to all 168 people on the wall of shame
then i can understand you giving those rules to me.but if you are not giving  those same rules to all
168 people on the wall of shame then it means that you are picking on me because you know that i
am disabled & can not fight back.plus

2)i feel that the law is not doing enough to protect me from the type of abuse that my father did to me.
while i do have to look at the good my father did  to me also(i spoke about it in article #105)

Maybe i should do vigilante on my father too?my father did me alot of good also but i still feel that the
law is not doing enough to protect me from the abuse that he did to me.so maybe i should  do vigilante
on my father too.or you are going to say that my father is a good person just because he is my father.
is that what you are going to say?the abuse that my father did to me i spoke all about it in article #105.

Now let,s look at the 3rd type which  is they are out to do as much harm as they possibly can but they
are careful not to break the law.now for those that are out to do as much harm as they possibly  can
without breaking the law let me just say something on that.a couple of years ago there was an article
on collive which spoke all about onoas devorim.here is a copy of that article on collive from a couple
of years ago.here it is.

Jul 24, 2015

Before Commenting, Read This

Before typing away your comment against a person or an opposing opinion, read what halacha says
about verbal harassment.

By Rabbi Chaim Hillel Raskin, Moreh Hora'ah at Beis Hora'ah in Rechovot, Israel

The Torah says, "A man should not wrong his fellow."[1] Chazal explain that one must be sincere in
social interactions just as in business, and one may not harass another person verbally or cause him
any discomfort (ono'as devarim).[2]

Here are some examples of this prohibition brought in halacha:

One may not call a person by a derogatory nickname. Even if the nickname is generally used in a
friendly manner (e.g. height, hair color), one may not use it if his intention is to make him
uncomfortable.[3]

One may not mention to a person a previous lifestyle that will make him uncomfortable
(e.g. before he was Torah observant).

One may not ask someone a question for which he won't know the answer and will be ashamed.[4]
Thus, one may not ask a guest to recite a dvar Torah if they don't have what to say.[5]

Likewise, it is forbidden to test a child on material or in a manner which he won't be able to answer,
and he will become embarrassed (unless this is necessary to motivate him).[6]

One may not knowingly send a person to a supplier that doesn't carry the sought after product, thereby
causing agony to the buyer or the seller.[7]

One may not tell someone who is going through a hard time that they are at fault, because they didn't
do what they were supposed to.[8] One may only suggest that they reexamine their actions in a
gentle way that won't hurt their feelings.[9]

Chazal say that verbal harassment is even more severe than causing financial damage since he
hurts the person himself (not his property) and the misdeed cannot be undone (unlike a financial
loss which can be repaid). If the one who was harassed cries out to Hashem he is immediately
answered.[10]

Beis Din has the authority to punish a verbal harasser. Some say that he should be placed in nidui
(a form of cherem) until he will monetarily appeases the offender, while others hold that he
deserves makas mardus (lashes).[11]

SOURCES:

1. ויקרא כה, יז.

2. ב"מ נח ע"ב.

3. שו"ע חו"מ סי' רכח ס"ה.

4 . שו"ע שם ס"ד.

5. ספר חסידים סי' שיב.

6. ראה פתחי חושן הלכות אונאה פט"ו הע' יב.

7. ראה שוע"ר הל' אונאה סכ"ח.

8. ראה שוע"ר שם, ומפרשי הגמ' בב"מ שם.

9. ראה ברכות דף ה' ובמפרשים שם, שהרי אמרו חז"ל שכשיסורים באים לאדם יפשפש במעשיו.

10. שוע"ר שם סכ"ז.

11. ראה פת"ח שם ס"ב ובהערות.

Originaly published in Lmaan Yishmeu, a publication by Merkaz Anash

Now while there is such a thing as freedom of speach just because you are within the law does
not mean that what you are doing is right.just because it,s legal does not mean that it,s mutar by
halachah.maybe eat chazer on yom kippur too.you won,t go to jail for eating chazer on yom kippur.
maybe do that too.so you want to hurt me as much as possible without breaking the law while you
are not as bad as the  first 2 types of jcw gangsters you are oiver(am i spellinng it right?)the halachah
of onoas devorim.

Now let,s look at the 4th type which is they are against me but they will not do anything  to me unless
i bother them.those that are against me but they will not do anything to me unless i bother them
those types of people maybe they don,t mind if i ask them something if it doesn,t bother them to
answer this for me.did you ever hear of ahavas yisroel?veohavto lereacho komocho?a guy like me
who

1)Is disabled

2)suffers alot from being depressed

3)weighs 300 lbs but can not fight back somebody half his  size

4)went through a very traumitizing childhood

5)didn,t realize how serious it is

6)didn,t mean any harm

7)has apologized 50 million times for his actions

& you can not forgive somebody like me?ok if you feel that you have to close off the relationship with
me fine do it but i just want to let you know what you are doing.

Menachem piekarski

Article #106(continued from article #105)

Inconsistencies

Monday june 4th 2018 8.00pm This is continuation of what i spoke about in article #105 Now last week
there were a couple of times last week when i was at different simchas in crown heights when people
came over to me & asked me to leave.they  did not touch me or do anything to me but they just came
over to me & asked me to leave.now everytime somebody comes over to me & asks me to leave they
are frightening me & after 120 years you will have to give a very big din vcheshbon for frightening me
like that.when i go to a simcha the only ones that have the right to ask me to leave is the one that
makes the simcha or the parents, grandparents, great grandparents & so forth.meaning that if it,s a
lchaim, chasuna or sheva brochos then the only people that have the right to ask me  to leave are the
choson, kallah, chosons parents, kallahs parents grandparents & so forth.if it,s a sholom zochor, bris
or pidyon haben then the parents, grandparents or great grandparents of the baby are the only ones
that have the right to ask me to leave.if it,s an obsherin then the parents, grandparents & great
grandparents of the kid have the right to ask me to leave.if it,s a bar mitzvah then the bar mitzvah
bochur himself or his parents or his grandparents are the only ones that have the right to ask me to
leave.now everytime somebody other than these people that i just mentioned ask me to  leave they are
frightening me & after 120 years they will be burning in gehinom for frightening me at the simcha.the
people that i just mentioned now are the only ones that have the right to ask me to leave & nobody else
except the people that i just mentioned have the right to ask me to leave.

But now comes a little different topic.a little change of topic.the fact that these jcw gangsters are
frightening me by asking me to leave that is one thing  but maybe now i can bring up something else
also if you don,t mind.

All those that came over to me at different simchas last week asking me to leave maybe you don,t
mind if i ask you something if it doesn,t bother you to answer this for me.there are 168 people on jewish
community watch & the  wall of shame are you doing the same thing to all 168 people on the wall of
shame?are you doing that to all 168 people on the wall of shame or just to me?if you go to a simcha
& you see any of the others on the wall of shame at the simcha are you going to ask them to leave
also?because if you are doing that only to me & not to the others on the wall of shame then it means
that you are picking on me because you know that i am disabled & can not fight back.

Now  comes something else also a little different.this is something else & a little different too but maybe
i can bring this up also & here it is.all those that came over to me & asked me to leave the simcha last
week  if you like you can say like this if you like.

I DID NOT TOUCH MENACHEM.ALL I DID IS ASK HIM TO LEAVE.THE FACT THAT I
FRIGHTENED HIM BY ASKING HIM TO LEAVE THAT IS HIS PROBLEM NOT MINE.ALL I DID IS
FREEDOM OF SPEACH.I DID NOT TOUCH HIM OR DO ANYTHING TO HIM & WHAT I DID IS
NOTHING MORE THAN FREEDOM OF SPEACH.THE FACT THAT I FRIGHTENED HIM BY
ASKING HIM TO LEAVE THAT IS HIS PROBLEM NOT MINE.WHAT I DID IS NOTHING MORE
THAN FREEDOM OF SPEACH

Now if you like you can something like that if you like.but in that case everything i say on this site is
also freedom of speach.if you like you can say freedom of speach but in that case you have nothing
 to complain about if if i speak about it on this site because everything i say on this site is also freedom
of speach.

Now as time goes on i am going to be talking about this more & more & more as  time goes on

Menachem piekarski.(continues with article #107)